top of page


Public·16 members

Buy Fish Cillin [WORK]

First, fish antibiotics are completely unregulated. Technically, they should fall under the purview of the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees both human and animal drugs. Those animals including companion animals (dogs, cats, horses) and food animals (cattle, pigs, chickens). Yet no ornamental fish antibiotics are approved by the FDA.

buy fish cillin

"The antibiotics available in pet stores or online for ornamental fish have not been approved, conditionally approved, or indexed by the FDA, so it is illegal to market them," the FDA said in a statement to The statement continued:

The FDA says that it does not have any data on how prevalent the fish antibiotics problem is. "We are currently looking into these products," representatives wrote in a statement. "FDA considers taking action based on its resources, the risk the product poses, and its public health priorities."

So what if you skip the doctor, take a gamble and choose wrong? Well, each drug comes with its own set of potential side effects and allergic reactions. Taking amoxicillin while suffering a viral infection such as mono, for instance, can cause the body to erupt in rashes, says Morgan. Ciprofloxacin, previously a go-to for UTIs and sinus infections, has come under recent scrutiny for causing lasting damage to tendons, muscles, joints, nerves and the central nervous system. Many other antibiotic classes come with their own unpleasant effects.

In 2002, Army physician Brandon J. Goff wrote a letter to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine documenting an encounter with an unnamed Army Special Forces soldier who came to him with a sinus infection after self-medicating with fish antibiotics from a pet store. The soldier described this source of antibiotics as "common knowledge among all branches of the American Special Forces community," according to Goff.

They focused on nine fish antibiotics that could be misused by humans: amoxicillin, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, erythromycin, metronidazole, penicillin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The team noted the cost and availability of the drugs, and compared the number of likes and dislikes for 2,288 reviews related to human and non-human use. In an attempt to avoid falsely inflating the number, the researchers didn't include generic quotes like "good product" in their data.

The authors concluded: "Although infrequent, antibiotics intended for fish use are being purchased online without a prescription for self-medication to circumvent professional medical care. Reviews related to human use generate significant online traffic compared to reviews unrelated to human use."

Asked why people might buy drugs marketed for fish, Bookstaver said: "The convenience of online purchasing and in-home delivery is likely a contributor. The patient does not have to leave the home to receive treatment. Avoiding a visit to a physician's office and the pharmacy may not only be perceived as inconvenient but also a financial burden to the patient.

He went on: "The use of fish antibiotics, or any antibiotics obtained without proper prescription, may cause unintended adverse effects, delay appropriate treatment and thus put others at risk for spread of the infection, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance."

Their interest in this topic was also piqued by two studies. One was a case study published in the New England Journal Of Medicine, on a member of the Army Special Forces who had bought fish medication at his local pet store. The other was a study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine earlier this year, which identified the trend of people using antibiotics they weren't prescribed as a "seemingly prevalent and understudied public health problem in the United States."

Last month, this issue was the focus of an article published by WBUR public radio, which featured a 63-year-old man whose fridge was stocked with antibiotics for fish. He said he took matters into his own hands after his doctor was reluctant to give him the drugs.

People are buying antibiotics intended for treating fish and taking them themselves. The fish antibiotics are cheap, but they're not approved by the FDA. Jacki Lyden talks with Doctor Stuart Levy , a professor of medicine at Tufts University and author of the book The Antibiotic Paradox.

For example, there are strict regulations about how human antibiotics must be packaged, stored, and shipped. In an extreme case, the fish antibiotics you buy could be contaminated with protozoan or microbes. However, a more likely scenario is that poor storage conditions could have caused the antibiotics to deteriorate and lose effectiveness.

I get mine from my horse vet,.Yea, sick horse, I need a bottle of penn 500 250mg pills or a bottle of sulfa..blahblashBut said vet legally needs to check my horse out before he can hand over meds.Could get injectable penicillin but that exp is normally within a year to 18 months.

They are actually intended for fish, you use it for various fin skin or other fish illnesses. They usually come in some sort of capsules that you open and sprinkle the content into the tank as directed. Just an FYI.

You may find an antibiotic on a pet store shelf, or an online pet store, with the same name as a drug prescribed for you or your family members. Drugs like ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline are sold to treat bacterial diseases in fish and they are frequently prescribed antibiotics for people.

Help control common bacterial infections in your finned friends with Midland Vet Services Aqua-Mox Forte Fish Antibiotic. This broad spectrum antibiotic exerts a bactericidal action on gram-positive and some gram-negative bacteria. It may help control bacterial diseases in fish, including Aeromonas and Pseudomonas Genera and Mysobacterial Group (Gill Diseases, Chondrococcus).

At VetSupply, we carry a wide range of fish antibiotics including powder, tablets and capsules. For any type of fish in your aquarium, get fish antibiotics at our online store VetSupply with huge discounts and free shipping.

A team of researchers at the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy examined online reviews from 24 websites selling nine different kinds of fish antibiotics. These fish antibiotics could be misused by humans, namely amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cephalexin, erythromycin, doxycycline, metronidazole, clindamycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and penicillin.

The team found that out of the reviews, they looked at, 2.4 percent or 55 reviews showed that customers bought the product for human use. These reviews also received more likes from other users than regular reviews did, with 9.2 likes on the comment about human consumption of fish antibiotics compared to just 1.3 likes for those not mentioning human intake.

One of the issues health experts are worried about is that these antibiotics intended for fish are available over-the-counter, while those for dogs and cats still need a prescription. If these drugs are readily available online and in stores, it could contribute to the increasing antimicrobial resistance. Also, it can lead to delayed appropriate treatment, which could endanger the life of the user.

The ASHP reports that consumers that seek cheaper and faster access to antibiotics are consuming drugs that are intended for fish rather than humans. Taking these drugs could potentially lead to dangerous consequences, including adverse side effects, antibiotic drug resistance, and treatment failures.

Laguipo, Angela. (2019, December 12). Americans are taking fish antibiotics to save money. News-Medical. Retrieved on March 30, 2023 from

If you are buying wild fish, the answer is no. However, for farmed fish the answer is not as simple. In well-managed, uncrowded and clean facilities, farmers can eliminate the need for antibiotics and raise antibiotic-free fish. Those would come one step closer to the organic designation. But the vast majority of aquaculture facilities use antibiotics to cure the diseases that can be caused by overcrowding and filth.

This study is a systematic review of cultural narratives that drive American belief in the value and efficacy of stocking up on fish antibiotics for human consumption. Popularized by "doomsday prepper" forums and survivalist medical professionals' online videos, this narrative suggests that in some scenarios humans may benefit from such treatments-even as they note its contraindication to mainstream public health advice. Discussions in crowd-sourcing forums however, reveal that in practice Americans are using them as a form of home remedy to treat routine infections without missing work or to make up for gaps in insurance coverage. This article argues for greater attention to what makes it plausible and reasonable to treat human conditions with animal medications. It suggests that public health initiatives should address such decisions as emerging from a rational analysis of social and economic conditions rather than dismissing such practices as dangerous to population and individual health outcomes. As social scientists of medicine have long argued, collective narratives about health and medicine illustrate deeply the broader contexts in which communities understand and experience bodily state and shape how communities interact with public health institutions and respond to medical expertise. This study surveys online discussions about "fish mox" to show how participants contest medical expertise and promote a more distributed form of populist expertise. As such, consuming fish mox is both panacea for health inequality and a critique of health institutions for perpetrating such stratification.

Fish Cephalexin also known as Kelflex, is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used in the treatment of a wide range on non-specific bacterial infections. It is effective against a number of pathogenetic bacteria associated with ornamental fish diseases. 041b061a72


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...
Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
bottom of page